Strategy

Fake Door Testing

A practical product validation method for measuring demand with real user behaviour before committing engineering effort.

How to use fake door testing to validate demand for unbuilt ideas, prioritise what to build, and reduce product risk through real behavioural signals.

20 November 20144 min read

Quick take

If you want to know if people want something before building it, put a door there and see who tries to open it.

What it is

Fake door testing is a UX method used to measure real user interest in a , product, or before it exists.

Users are presented with something that looks real, such as a button, link, or , but when they interact with it, they are informed that the is not yet available.

The is tracked to understand demand and intent.

It is often used on live products to validate ideas using real rather than assumptions.

The focus is on what users do, not what they say.

The goal is to determine whether something is worth building.

Fake door testing is most useful when the key question is demand, and you need behaviour evidence before building.

When to use it

Use this method when you need to validate demand.

It is most useful when:

You are considering a new feature or product
You want real behavioural data
You need to prioritise what to build
You want to reduce development risk
You have access to live traffic

It is less useful when:

misleading users could damage trust
the feature is already committed
you cannot track interactions properly
Fake door testing is often used in product discovery and validation.

Key takeaway

Use fake door testing when you need real demand signals to decide if an idea deserves build investment.

How to run it

Set up properly.

Before you start, be clear on the or idea you are testing, where it will appear in the product, and how will be tracked.

Ensure the setup feels realistic.

Run the method.

Fake door testing is simple but precise.

Create a realistic entry point (button, link, CTA). Place it in a relevant part of the product. Track clicks or . Show a message explaining the is not available. Optionally capture interest (e.g. sign-ups or ).

Focus on , not explanation.

Capture and make sense of it.

The value comes from real usage .

After running the test: analyse , compare against expectations, identify of interest, and decide whether to , refine, or drop the idea.

Use this to prioritise effectively.

What to look for

Focus on:

Interest
How many users interact
Intent
Where and how users engage
Context
When users try to access it
Demand
Whether there is enough value
Follow-up
Sign-ups or expressions of interest

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If is broken, it can backfire.

misleading or frustrating users
placing the fake door in the wrong context
poor tracking or data collection
misinterpreting results
not following up on insights

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

real evidence of user demand
behavioural validation
prioritisation clarity
reduced risk before development

Key takeaway

It helps you build what people actually want.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can help you validate demand using fake door testing so you the right things at the right time.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just real from real users.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What is fake door testing in UX?

It is a method for measuring interest in a before it exists.

When should you use fake door testing?

Use it when validating demand for new ideas.

Is it deceptive?

It can be if handled poorly, so transparency after is important.

What can you measure?

Clicks, , and expressions of interest.

Does fake door testing improve UX?

Yes. It helps ensure you prioritise users actually want.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services. The work usually starts where things have become harder than they need to be: unclear journeys, inconsistent products, competing priorities, or teams trying to move forward without a clear direction. I help simplify the problem, shape the right next step, and turn complexity into something people can actually use.

Previous feedback

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer

01/20