UR

Co-discovery Sessions

A practical research method for understanding collaboration, shared reasoning, and how people make sense of things together.

How to use co-discovery sessions to observe collaborative behaviour, richer verbalisation, and how shared understanding develops in real time.

30 November 20245 min read

Quick take

If you want to see how people figure things out together, not alone, run co-discovery sessions.

What it is

Co- are a qualitative UX method where two participants work through tasks together while thinking aloud and discussing what they are doing.

They are often used in and exploratory to observe how people collaborate, explain decisions, and react in real time.

Unlike individual , co- introduces social . Participants naturally question, challenge, and explain things to each other.

The goal is to uncover , reasoning, and shared understanding through conversation and collaboration.

Co-discovery sessions are useful when the interaction between people tells you as much as the task itself.

When to use it

Use this method when collaboration or shared understanding is part of the experience.

It is most useful when:

Users naturally work in pairs or groups
You want to understand how people explain and justify decisions
You need more natural verbalisation than traditional think-aloud
Tasks benefit from discussion and shared problem-solving
You want to observe how understanding develops in real time

It is less useful when:

Tasks are highly individual or sensitive
You need independent, unbiased responses
One participant may dominate or influence the other too strongly
You require precise measurement of individual performance
Co-discovery sessions are often used alongside usability testing and interviews to provide both behaviour and reasoning.

Key takeaway

Use co-discovery when collaboration itself is part of the behaviour you want to understand.

How to run it

Set up properly.

Before you start, be clear on what tasks participants will complete, whether participants should know each other, and how collaboration fits into the .

Choose participants who are comfortable interacting. This affects the quality of the .

Run the method.

Co- should feel natural and collaborative.

Introduce the task and set expectations. Encourage participants to talk to each other, not just the moderator. Let them work through tasks together. Observe how they explain, question, and decide. Intervene only when needed to keep things on track.

Avoid over-structuring. The is where the value lies.

Capture and make sense of it.

The value comes from both and conversation.

Look across to identify how participants explain concepts, where confusion or disagreement occurs, shared or misunderstandings, and in decision-making.

Pay attention to both what they do and what they say to each other.

What to look for

Focus on:

Collaboration
How participants work together to complete tasks
Verbalisation
How they explain actions and decisions
Misunderstandings
Where participants disagree or correct each other
Decision-making
How choices are made and justified
Language
How users describe the product or experience

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If the feels controlled, you lose the natural dynamic.

pairing participants poorly
one participant dominating the session
over-intervention by the moderator
treating it like a standard usability test
ignoring the interaction between participants

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

insight into collaborative behaviour
clearer understanding of user reasoning
visibility of shared mental models and misunderstandings
richer verbal feedback than individual sessions

Key takeaway

It helps you see how understanding is formed, not just what people do.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can help you understand how people think, decide, and work together.

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just clear you can act on.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What are co-discovery sessions in UX?

Co- are a method where two participants complete tasks together while discussing their actions and decisions.

When should you use co-discovery sessions?

Use them when collaboration is natural or when you want more verbal than individual provide.

What is the difference between co-discovery and usability testing?

Co- involves two participants working together, while typically involves one participant working alone.

Should participants know each other?

It depends. Familiar participants may collaborate more naturally, but unfamiliar pairs can reveal different .

Are co-discovery sessions better than individual sessions?

They provide different . Co- reveals and discussion, while individual sessions show independent behaviour.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services. The work usually starts where things have become harder than they need to be: unclear journeys, inconsistent products, competing priorities, or teams trying to move forward without a clear direction. I help simplify the problem, shape the right next step, and turn complexity into something people can actually use.

Previous feedback

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer

01/20