Accessibility

WCAG Review

A practical UX method for assessing products against defined WCAG criteria and identifying measurable accessibility compliance gaps.

How to run a WCAG review to evaluate compliance, document gaps, and prioritise accessibility remediation.

02 September 20134 min read

Quick take

If you need to know whether you meet accessibility standards, run a WCAG review.

What it is

A review is a UX method used to assess how well a product meets the Web Content Guidelines (WCAG).

It involves evaluating , content, and against specific criteria defined in the framework.

These guidelines cover areas such as perceivability, operability, understandability, and robustness.

The review identifies where the product meets or fails to meet compliance levels such as 2.1 AA.

It combines manual testing and tooling to assess both technical compliance and real .

The focus is on measurable standards and clear pass or fail criteria.

The goal is to ensure requirements are met and to highlight what needs fixing.

A strong WCAG review balances strict criteria checks with practical usability impact for real users.

When to use it

Use this method when compliance is required or expected.

It is most useful when:

you need to meet WCAG standards
you are working in regulated sectors
you are preparing for launch or audit
you need clear compliance reporting
you want to reduce legal risk

It is less useful when:

you are exploring early concepts
compliance is not a requirement
there is no plan to act on findings
WCAG reviews are often used alongside accessibility audits.

Key takeaway

Run a WCAG review when you need explicit evidence of compliance status against recognised criteria.

How to run it

Set up properly.

Before you start, be clear on the scope of the review, the and level, and the pages, , or components to assess.

Ensure coverage of key .

Run the method.

reviews are structured and criteria-based.

Assess each element against guidelines. Test keyboard and focus states. Check compatibility. Review colour contrast and readability. Use tools to support evaluation. Document pass or fail against each criterion.

Focus on standards, not interpretation.

Capture and make sense of it.

The value comes from clear compliance .

After the review: document issues by criterion, indicate severity and impact, highlight compliance gaps, and prioritise fixes.

Use this to guide remediation work.

What to look for

Focus on:

Perceivable
Can users access content in different ways
Operable
Can users navigate and interact
Understandable
Is content clear and predictable
Robust
Does it work across technologies
Compliance
Whether standards are met

Where it goes wrong

Most issues come from:

If it’s only about passing, suffers.

treating it as a tick-box exercise
relying only on automated tools
misunderstanding WCAG criteria
ignoring real user impact
not fixing identified issues

What you get from it

Done properly, this method gives you:

clear view of WCAG compliance
structured list of issues
prioritised remediation plan
reduced legal and accessibility risk

Key takeaway

It helps you meet recognised standards properly.

Get in touch

If this sounds like something you need, we can run a review and help you meet standards with .

No guesswork. No assumptions. Just clear, compliant, usable design.

FAQ

Common questions

A few practical answers to the questions that usually come up around this method.

What is a WCAG review in UX?

It is a method for assessing compliance with standards.

When should you run a WCAG review?

Before launch, during audits, or when improving .

What does WCAG stand for?

.

Is it the same as an accessibility audit?

No. It focuses specifically on compliance criteria.

Does a WCAG review improve UX?

Yes. It ensures standards are properly met.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

Ready to improve your product?

UX, research and product leadership for teams tackling complex digital services. The work usually starts where things have become harder than they need to be: unclear journeys, inconsistent products, competing priorities, or teams trying to move forward without a clear direction. I help simplify the problem, shape the right next step, and turn complexity into something people can actually use.

Previous feedback

Will Parkhouse

Senior Content Designer

01/20